Huda, Tanzil (2009) (Peer Review + Similarity + Document) UN: TO BE CONTINUED OR ABORTED? FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember, Jember, Indonesia.
![]() |
Text
1. Peer Review 1 & 2.pdf Download (1MB) |
![]() |
Text
2. Cek Hasil Turnitin.pdf Download (2MB) |
![]() |
Text
3. Artikel.pdf Download (398kB) |
Abstract
One of the qualities of education concerns with content standard. The implementation of the standard is the form of the issuance of Permen (Minister of Education’s Decree) number 22 and 23/2006 which becomes the basis of conducting the teaching learning at school including its evaluation. UN (National Exams) as the final form of the evaluation has been expected to be the measurement of the students’ achievement of the cotent standard. But the controversies arise to respond the implementation of UN. However, UN is supposed to be the most valid and dependable form of measurement of the content standard of students’ achievement and of school.
Item Type: | Peer Review |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | UN (National Exams), highstakes test, content standard |
Subjects: | 800 Literature and Rhetoric > 820 English Literatures |
Divisions: | Faculty of Teaching and Education Science > Department of English Literature Education (S1) |
Depositing User: | Tanzil Huda |
Contact Email Address: | tanzilhuda@unmuhjember.ac.id |
Date Deposited: | 11 Jan 2022 07:27 |
Last Modified: | 24 Jan 2022 01:40 |
URI: | http://repository.unmuhjember.ac.id/id/eprint/12466 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |