Builders Performance Improvement With Briefing In Jember

GUNASTI, AMRI (2020) Builders Performance Improvement With Briefing In Jember. International Journal Of Scientific & Technology Research.

	Text PeerReview2.pdf Download (515kB)
	Text 2. Turnitin.pdf Download (2MB)
	Text 2. Dokumen Lengkap.pdf Download (1MB)

Abstract

One of the world phenomenon of construction is still a gap between the performance of builders, which is expected by the foreman, with the reality on the ground. The results of empirical studies state that guidance can improve performance. The purpose of this study was to test the performance indicators Builders, once briefed. Research using One group pretest-posttest design. Initial assessment by the foreman, to Builders (pre- test), conducted during one month. Then the Builders treated in the form of guidance for a month, and given the assessment (post-test), then t test. The results showed that, Indicator: 1) target the jobs and duties of the foreman, can Builders met, 2) Builders always try to produce the quality of work is good, compared with other colleagues, 3) Builders always work, in accordance with quality standards, which have been set by the foreman, 4) All jobs during this time, Builders can do, and the results are in accordance with the time, which had been planned, the performance decreases, after being given treatment, in the form of directives. Indicators: 1) The quantity of work Builders are in accordance with the standards of work expected by the foreman, 2) The results of the performance of Builders sometimes exceed the target given by the foreman, 3) Builders willing given additional quantity of work outside working hours if necessary, 4) Builders are always trying to reach the target employment has been established by the foreman, 5) Builders always focus on finishing the job, although foreman was no place, 6) In completing the work Builders always take the initiative without waiting for orders from the foreman, 7) the quantity of work Builders exceed the average Builders others, 8) Builders doing work with the calculating, meticulous, 9) Builders have the appropriate skills to work and tasks Builders do now, 10) the quality of work that has been set by the Overseer can be achieved properly and optimally,11) Builders skilled in their work and have the initiative to help colleagues with, 12) Builders always reduce the error rate in the works, 13) Quality of work Builders far better than Builders another 14 Builders adhere to all the rules and procedures set out in the work , 15) Builders not procrastinate, 16) Based on the absence of data, Builders come home from work, 17) Efficiency Builders time in completing the work exceeds the average of other Builders, performance improved after the treatment is given in the form of directives.

Item Type:	Peer Review
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Performance, Briefing, Builders, t test
Subjects:	600 Technology and Applied Science > 620 Engineering > 624 Civil Engineering
Divisions:	Faculty of Engineering > Department of Civil Engineering (S1)
Depositing User:	Amri Gunasti
Date Deposited:	01 Aug 2022 02:13
Last Modified:	01 Aug 2022 02:13
URI:	http://repository.unmuhjember.ac.id/id/eprint/14626

Actions (login required)

View Item